Friday, August 12, 2011

Summer School - Day Thirty - Report Cards

Last day of summer school. Students pick up report cards.

I am thinking about the inadequacy of our reporting system. Specifically 3 things are bothering me:

1. Percentage Grades
Most of my students have a high C+ or low B. What does that mean? No really! Do they understand 74% of the material? What material? What do they know and what do they still have trouble with? How is 74% different from 72%? One is a B and the other is not... why? Is the 74% student who coasted and did little studying really a better student than the 72% who worked really hard?

2. Demonstration of Learning (Growth)
My students have essentially one or two chances to demonstrate learning of any given topic. That's it. Even if they learn it later and demonstrate their new understanding on a final exam, that old failed quiz still haunts them. How much better if they demonstrate mastery in the future, this new data replaces the old? After all, their new knowledge has replaced their misunderstanding. Why can't new grades replace old ones?

3. Specificity of Learning
What do they not understand? What specific topics gave them trouble? Was it conceptual or procedural? If they didn't get the Pythagoras question, was it because they don't understand the theorem? Or because they have poor algebra skills? Or because they mixed up the legs and hypotenuse? I want to know! And really, the student needs to know in order to improve.

Enter standards-based grading. The more I read, the more I like. The B.C. curriculum is organized with specific learning outcomes and achievement indicators. It is a fairly simple task to map these indicators to standards and start tracking student progress in a more specific manner.

The great thing about it is not how it tracks growth or how it gives more specific information. Although that is great. The great thing is how this system helps students learn. It gives specific feedback, time for remediation, and opportunities to demonstrate growth.

The irony of this is how students react. They are addicted to grades. Even as I type this there is a student in my class complaining of how she failed French because she got an 82%.  She will need to go through grade withdrawal. I explained the new system and its benefits and she is terrified. But I know the new system will help her learn.

Summer School - Day Twenty-Nine - Teacher Thoughts

An informal poll of 3 other physics teachers at summer school reveals the following:
  1. Most physics teachers use the majority of class time to lecture yet acknowledge the limitations of lectures.
  2. Most physics teachers do some demonstrations or activities to teach concepts.
  3. Most physics teachers would like to do more labs but have little or no equipment.
  4. Most physics students love labs and activities.
  5. Most physics students don't like writing lab reports.
  6. Most physics teachers don't like marking lab reports.
  7. Most physics teachers grade based on quizzes and tests.
  8. Most physics teachers do NOT use standards-based grading.
  9. Most physics teachers are a little afraid of standards-based grading.
  10. Most physics students are wary of standards-based grading.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Eight - Review

My summer school class is reviewing for the Provincial Exam, a standardized test required for all grade 10 math students. Fortunately, I have sample exams to help prepare students for what they are likely to see on the exam. In the summer, it is an e-exam. For many students, this will be their first look at an e-exam. Today we tried a sample e-exam from the Ministry of Education website.

The problem with review like this for a class like this is that most students just write the exam as if it were the real exam. When they get to a question they are unsure of, they guess. There is no real attempt to understand the problem and really no value in the review. At the end of the e-exam there is a summary sheet that shows which questions were answered correctly and incorrectly and gives the correct solution. Few students used this data to go back and review concepts unless I specifically asked them to. And then they just went back and guessed again.

What really works for review? Physics! Blog! has some great ideas here and here. But these are for Honours Physics. I am dealing with unmotivated remedial math students in summer school. I wonder what a truly effective review activity would look like in this class.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Seven - Assessment

As summer school winds down, students are scrambling to complete projects and missed quizzes in a desperate attempt to boost their grade. They cram for a few minutes and then ask for a quiz. I give them a simple problem and watch them scratch out some incoherent scribbles. Even if they get the answer, it is clear that there is no understanding and no retained learning.

Over the summer, I have been reading a lot about standards-based grading. I think a system like this would correct a lot of the problems cited above. Students would not be scrambling because every standard is reassessable (is that a word?) at any time. They would not be cramming because standards are assessed throughout the course and reflect sustained learning and growth. There would be no incoherent scribbles because students would have a clear understanding of the standard to be assessed.

The biggest problem I have right now is that if a student does not complete a project, I have no data on that particular concept (standard) and the student receives a zero. This may not be because they do not understand or cannot demonstrate mastery. Perhaps the are just lazy or content with their current grade. Either way, it is not a good reflection of their actual learning of concepts in the course. The last minute cramming is more for my benefit than for theirs.

So many things about how I teach are beginning to irk me. This is good. It makes me question what I do and why I do it. I may not get to full blown standards-based grading this school year. But it is on my mind.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Six - Projects

My summer school students are working on a couple of trigonometry projects. One is a completely contrived problem involving an intricate roof line. Students must calculate various lengths and angles. The other requires that they estimate and calculate lengths and angles in the classroom using a metre stick and clinometer.

I question the value of these projects. They are decent enough as review of the basic concepts. And it does set the topic in a real world context (sort of). But I don't think it really challenges the students to see how math is used in the real world.

This course is specifically designed for students who are going to enter the trades. It seems like a better use of our time would be to go to a construction site where they are building a roof and see how the carpenters solve the problems of lengths and angles. I'm not sure they are using a whole lot of trigonometry on the work site.

I wonder what a real meaningful project would look like.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Five - Learning By Playing

The new curriculum in British Columbia suggests that mathematical skills are best learned in a problem-solving context. First, concretely through the use of manipulatives, then pictorially to represent concepts, and finally symbolically, making the full leap to abstract representations.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around what this would look like in a classroom. I had thought to use summer school as an opportunity to try out some new strategies and methods. But that hasn't happened as much as I would like. Although I have spent most of the summer pondering the implications of this approach.

It seems to me that this is exactly how children learn best. Children play with stuff. My one year-old puts everything in her mouth. She shakes it. She drops it from her high chair... over and over again. She passes it to me... then takes it back, She rolls it on the floor. She tries everything she can think of. Then discards it for something else.

My three year-old is the same. Just less drool. She pokes and prods and swings and shakes and rolls and throws and hides. She tries stuff. She loves soap as a play thing. She paints it, keeps it in her purse and uses it as money. Old store fliers are perfect for her projects. She demonstrates unique and creative ways to use common household items.

I think teenagers are the same. Watch them skateboard... or play video games. They explore and experiment. They try to break things until they figure out its limits and how it works. They are engaged and they persevere through failure.

I think our classrooms ought to give them the same opportunities.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Four - Lunch With Colleagues

One of my favourite pastimes is lunch. Eating out at a restaurant with friends. A nice break from the daily routine. Good food, good conversation, lots of laughter.

As a teacher, I don't often get the opportunity to go to lunch with colleagues. It is one of the privileges that most people in the business world take for granted. So, today, when I had a chance to sit down with 2 of my colleagues over burgers and sandwiches, I jumped at it.

The ability to talk with colleagues about our struggles, problem students, learning styles, lesson plans is one of the most important aspects of reflective teaching. Sometimes just venting can reinvigorate us for the stretch ahead.

But, at its best, collegial conversation is more than letting off steam. It allows us to connect with like-minded professionals who share our pain and our joy. It allows us to refine our ideas and strategies. It allows us to see teaching from a new perspective and challenges our most deeply held assumptions.

It allows us to rediscover our passion.

Thanks Kelly and Blair.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Summer School - Day Twenty-Three - Advanced Students

In Summer School, I am finding it difficult to adequately address the needs of my one advanced student. I know he is only taking this course for "fun" and intends to take more challenging math in the regular school year. He is quietly biding his time. But, I would like to challenge him more.

I have given him several puzzles related to the topics we are covering. The results are challenging my understanding of advanced student. He is quick with the basic material and leaves the rest of the class behind. He clearly grasps concepts quickly and can explain his thinking well. But the puzzles have exposed a weakness in lateral thinking and creative problem solving.

For a long time I have questioned how teachers talk about smart students. I think we label too quickly. When a student repeats back to us what we taught and does so with a minimum of help from us, we think they are bright. And they are. But they really have demonstrated little real learning beyond the ability to memorize.

I want to challenge students to think for themselves. I want to see students think deeply about concepts and be able to articulate their understanding. I want to see students make intuitive leaps without my guidance. I want to see students try creative ways to solve problems and succeed... or fail. I want to see students respond to failure with excitement and more drive to succeed.

I want to see advanced students show advanced thinking.

Summer School - Day Twenty-Two - Guest Post

I am away on holidays. Today's guest blogger is...

Summer School - Day Twenty-One - Great Schools

It is B.C. Day and my family and I are up north at Jack Frost Lake.

I am watching my 3 year old daughter interact with other kids and wondering what her schooling will be like. She just started pre-school this year so my wife and I are starting to think about her future in the public education system. We have lots of choices.

What school do we want her to go to? Do we want her to be in French Immersion? Do we move to an area with a better school? What defines a better school? How do you know? The Fraser Institute would say standardized test scores and graduation rates are prime indicators of a strong school. But there must be more to it than that.

I want my daughter to have a rich learning environment that includes the arts, sports, music, social justice and clubs. I want my daughter to be challenged to think, to explore her creativity, to try... and fail... and try again. I want her to have teachers like the ones I work with every day who see student learning as the ultimate goal and research, create and innovate to make it happen.

Educational issues become so much more important when it's your kid you're talking about.

Summer School - Day Twenty - Guest Post

I am away on holidays. Today's guest blogger is...

Summer School - Day Nineteen - The Calculus of Learning

Differentiation is a buzz word in my district. Finding ways to adapt lessons to address a variety of learning styles and learning paces. Creating problems and activities that allow all students to engage and work at a level that is appropriate to them. Differentiation... students working at different rates, different slopes.

It is a fairly simple task to remove complexity from a problem. It is another thing altogether to create a simple learning activity that still challenges students to think, wrestle and learn. An activity with more than one entry point that will allow struggling students to tackle the same basic concepts while advanced students apply those concepts in challenging contexts. Different learning slopes.

How this will apply in my physics classes next year? Most students who take physics would be classified as advanced. But, as I transition to a modeling-based method of teaching, I wonder how the variety of learning styles will respond. I wonder how many different learning slopes will be needed to ensure all students are successful.